Economists Do It With Models

Warning: “graphic” content…

Bookmark and Share
Follow Up: I Am No Longer Surprised That Economists Don’t Get Invited To Game Night…

August 9th, 2010 · 7 Comments
Follow Ups · Game Theory · Just For Fun

I wrote a few weeks ago about why it might not be the best idea to play board games involving play money with an economist. My explanation was inflation-related, but apparently there are other reasons. Reader Kit points me to NPR’s Planet Money:

If you think a regular Monopoly game takes forever, try playing with two economics professors. Just picking out the game tokens prompts a lesson in choice theory. According to one of them, it “illustrates a tremendous diversity of preferences in people, even about something as mundane as this.”

Yup, sounds about right. (On a side note, why is the scottie dog not more popular?) The whole article is pretty funny, especially the part where the economists start making up rules. Also, if you ever doubted that economists were always looking for, oh what are they called, “teachable moments,” I present the following:

But looking at Monopoly in post-recession 2010, the rules seem like a sure way to crash an economy: The bank can never run out of money, mortgages are easy to get, and when you build houses the rent always goes up.

“You might learn, if you are good at Monopoly, to think that real estate is a really good investment — a strategic insight that would have served you very badly, at least recently,” Roberts says.

Sigh. Dear Profs. Hammermesh and Roberts: If you’re going to go making up rules and such, might I suggest you incorporate a drinking game component. It seems to me like both of you could stand to relax a little. 🙂

Tags: Follow Ups · Game Theory · Just For Fun

7 responses so far ↓

  • 1 berriewine // Aug 9, 2010 at 2:29 pm

    I always picked the scottie dog.

  • 2 The Unqualified Economist // Aug 9, 2010 at 2:45 pm

    Hmm…adding a drinking component, how would that figure with Hamermesh’s paper “Grazing, Goods and Girth: Determinants and Effects” on wine-economics.org?

    http://www.wine-economics.org/workingpapers/AAWE_WP45.pdf

    Those inclined to add a drinking component have higher wages?

  • 3 Tristan T. // Aug 9, 2010 at 7:03 pm

    Perhaps if some of the drinking is combined with socializing/networking… (mmmm… wine.)

    Just remember to taste with your tongue, not the price tag on the bottle.

  • 4 online dating // Oct 13, 2011 at 9:33 am

    Thank you for adding this up, it had been handy and informed a lot

  • 5 kominki marmurowe // Oct 13, 2011 at 9:38 am

    I really appreciate this excellent article you’ve got deliver to us. I guarantee this may be great for the majority.

  • 6 kominki marmurowe // Oct 13, 2011 at 11:38 am

    Couldn’t have visit the best time. Superb post

  • 7 Happy952 // Dec 2, 2011 at 11:51 pm

    I intended to create you the very little observation to help say thanks over again with the gorgeous suggestions you have shown above. It is simply remarkably generous of you to deliver openly exactly what numerous people could have offered for sale as an electronic book in making some dough for their own end, most importantly given that you might have done it if you ever decided. The pointers likewise worked to be a easy way to fully grasp other people have the identical dreams just like my very own to learn a whole lot more pertaining to this issue. I know there are many more pleasurable moments ahead for individuals that discover your website.

Leave a Comment