Economists Do It With Models

Warning: “graphic” content…

Bookmark and Share
On Money, Gender And Happiness, Only A Little From The Onion…

April 16th, 2010 · 7 Comments
Happiness

You know you’re a social science geek when you read this from The Onion and it takes you a while to realize that it is, in fact, from The Onion:

BERKELEY, CA—A study published in the latest issue of the Journal Of Social Sciences revealed that the amount of time spent being happy has dropped to an all-time low of 13 nonconsecutive seconds per day. “According to our data, the average American experiences a 0.8-second window of happiness upon awakening, before remembering that they’re conscious beings in a relentlessly bleak and numbing world,” said Dr. Derek Moore, lead author of the paper. “Other periods of happiness include 1.9 seconds after a good meal; 0.6 seconds upon receiving a paycheck; 1.1 seconds following completion of a scientific study; and the 2.5 seconds approaching orgasm, just before the guilt sets in.” Researchers also recorded the smallest period of contentment yet, a 3.7-millisecond interval preceding the realization that one was experiencing happiness and that it could not possibly last.

(Apparently I’m not the only one. Alex Tabarrok over at Marginal Revolution puts a “Not from The Onion” disclaimer on some of his posts. I am convinced that one of these days there is going to be a bizarre coincidence where The Onion inadvertently reports accurate news.)

When you think about it, the Onion article isn’t really that far off from reality. Social scientists (including economists) do in fact study happiness, including both what makes us happy on an abstract level (see Dan Gilbert’s Stumbling on Happiness or Tal Ben-Shahar’s Happier, for example.) and what trends in happiness look like from a historical perspective.

Economists Justin Wolfers and Betsey Stevenson spent the bulk of their careers studying happiness, and they have a number of interesting findings. First and foremost, they gravitate towards the time-honored economic question of Does Money Buy Happiness?:

If anything, Ms. Stevenson and Mr. Wolfers say, absolute income seems to matter more than relative income. In the United States, about 90 percent of people in households making at least $250,000 a year called themselves “very happy” in a recent Gallup Poll. In households with income below $30,000, only 42 percent of people gave that answer. But the international polling data suggests that the under-$30,000 crowd might not be happier if they lived in a poorer country.

This is in contrast to a finding known as the Easterlin paradox, which states that, although the wealthiest people in a society are generally the happiest, the wealthiest people in the richest societies don’t report to be happier than the richest people in less well-off societies. This observed paradox is used to posit that it is relative income that matters for happiness, and that we are on a sort of hedonic treadmill that requires us to obtain new and exciting toys in order to maintain the happiness status quo. (I’ve written before about Louis CK and the hedonic treadmill here.)

So money does buy happiness…like I always expected, of course. (insert evil laugh here) Or, at the very least, the jury is still out on the matter. Betsey Stevenson dives even further into the matter and reports that, despite the fact that women have gotten a lot of objective gains in terms of equal rights, lifestyle choices, and so on, they report themselves to be less happy than they were 30 years ago:

Given all these changes, the evidence presented by Stevenson and Wolfers is striking: women report being less happy today than they were 35 years ago, especially relative to the corresponding happiness rates for men. This is true of working women and stay-at-home moms, married women and those that are single, the highly educated and the less educated. It is worse for older women; those aged 18-29 don’t seem to be doing too badly. Women with kids have fared worse than women without kids. The only notable exception to the pattern is black women, who are happier today than they were three decades ago.

Well then. Let’s at least hope that women are happy for more than 13 seconds a day, since I really hate it when The Onion is right.

Tags: Happiness

7 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Mitch // Apr 17, 2010 at 12:36 am

    I am convinced that one of these days there is going to be a bizarre coincidence where The Onion inadvertently reports accurate news.

    You may have seen the story where the Onion predicted the endgame of the more-blades-per-razor race about a year before Gillette actually made it happen:

    http://boingboing.net/2005/09/14/gillettes-5blade-raz.html

  • 2 econgirl // Apr 19, 2010 at 1:08 am

    Hehe. Well, apparently Gillette is either tired of the mockery or has run out of blades to stick onto its product, since it’s now focusing on comfort rather than number of blades:

    http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/19/business/media/19adco.html

  • 3 paleo // Oct 2, 2011 at 5:26 am

    I found this great site using google.com So i desire to appreciation for your work. You have carried out really excellent site. Great work, great site! Many thanks!

  • 4 DOMINICK DESLAURIER // Nov 2, 2011 at 2:17 pm

    You must take part in a contest for probably the greatest blogs on the web. I will recommend this post On Money, Gender And Happiness, Only A Little From The Onion…!

  • 5 Sybil418 // Dec 2, 2011 at 11:51 pm

    I wanted to draft you one very little observation just to say thanks a lot again just for the beautiful pointers you have discussed on this website. It’s quite shockingly generous of you to give easily exactly what a number of us might have distributed for an ebook to end up making some bucks on their own, certainly since you could have done it if you ever decided. Those guidelines as well worked to be a easy way to comprehend other people online have similar eagerness similar to my own to understand a good deal more pertaining to this problem. I am sure there are numerous more pleasant occasions ahead for folks who view your site.

  • 6 Keira Wimble // May 19, 2013 at 12:58 pm

    First of all I want to say terrific blog! I had a quick question that I’d like to ask if you don’t mind. I was interested to find out how you center yourself and clear your head prior to writing. I’ve had trouble clearing my thoughts in getting my ideas out. I do take pleasure in writing however it just seems like the first 10 to 15 minutes are usually lost simply just trying to figure out how to begin. Any recommendations or hints? Many thanks!San Francisco Roofing, 1276 7th Ave., San Francisco, CA 94122 – (415) 800-4100

  • 7 milfs porn // Jun 28, 2014 at 8:10 pm

    Hmm it looks like your website ate my first comment (it was extremely
    long) so I guess I’ll just sum it up what I submitted and say, I’m thoroughly
    enjoying your blog. I too am an aspiring blog writer
    but I’m still new to everything. Do you have any tips for inexperienced blog
    writers? I’d definitely appreciate it.

Leave a Comment