Economists Do It With Models

Warning: “graphic” content…

Bookmark and Share
“Graphic” Content, Dating Edition…

September 3rd, 2009 · 16 Comments
Just For Fun

I think it is pretty clear that I like funny graphs. There are many such items on the Internet, so I see a lot more of them than I actually post. I liked the following one, but thought that it wasn’t quite post worthy on its own, for example:

Obviously, my initial thought was “or maybe it’s because you spend all of your time posting nerdy graphs on the Internet.” And then I spent a while deciding whether I wanted to be the pot or the kettle. (I chose the pot, in case you are curious. I think it’s because I can’t whistle.) While I was contemplating this, a friend reminded me of the following xkcd comic:

*sigh* Somewhere at the edge of the bell curve is the guy for me…

Hm. I feel like I should add in something economics-y here just out of principle. Luckily, this line of reasoning reminds me of a paper by Claudia Goldin and Larry Katz entitled “The Power of the Pill: Oral Contraceptives and Women’s Career and Marriage Decisions” that basically shows that the wide availability of birth control has in fact widened the dating pool for older people. (I think the authors refer to the phenomenon as creating a “thicker marriage market” than previously existed at older ages.) Here’s the abstract of the paper (again, lots of words):

The fraction of U.S. college graduate women entering professional programs increased substantially just after 1970, and the age at first marriage among all U.S. college graduate women began to soar around the same year. We explore the relationship between these two changes and the diffusion of the birth control pill (“the pill”) among young, unmarried college graduate women. Although the pill was approved in 1960 by the Food and Drug Administration and spread rapidly among married women, it did not diffuse among young, single women until the late 1960s after state law changes reduced the age of majority and extended “mature minor” decisions. We present both descriptive time series and formal econometric evidence that exploit cross‐state and cross‐cohort variation in pill availability to young, unmarried women, establishing the “power of the pill” in lowering the costs of long‐duration professional education for women and raising the age at first marriage.

I cannot stop chuckling at how much more extensive Claudia’s wikipedia page (linked to above) is than Larry’s. I also find it funny that Claudia and Larry write about the economics of marriage and family and are involved in some sort of long-term on-again off-again relationship that I cannot claim to understand. I suppose those who can, do, and those who can’t, teach? 🙂

Tags: Just For Fun

16 responses so far ↓

  • 1 KG // Sep 3, 2009 at 3:48 pm

    And those who can’t teach, teach gym.

  • 2 PeterM // Sep 3, 2009 at 4:16 pm

    The very last cartoon bubble resonated with me. It would seem that for someone having a very high intelligence and or education level, and assuming they wanted to date someone at or near that level, that the dating pool is very small. And then I thought that if one is in the middle of the curve, it’s like a dating buffet. (Of course one uses other factors in selecting a mate, but intelligence level is a pretty big filter.)

  • 3 Carl Peter Klapper // Sep 3, 2009 at 4:46 pm

    The pill also reduces the need to be married by reducing the probability that long-term sexual liaisons will result in offspring and thus the need for a family led by married partners to take care of them. If dating without any intent to marry allows a wider range of years of non-creepiness than dating toward marriage, then the number of eligible dates for each person may be even wider then your analysis shows.

    On the other hand, the key missing factor is romantic destiny. For those of us who have been around the block a few times and have married compatible partners reasonably close to our own age and then dumped by them and divorced, no closeness in age or other characteristics will make up for someone not being “the one” and no distance in these will take “the one” out of consideration for marriage.

  • 4 Agnitio // Sep 3, 2009 at 7:02 pm

    This graph is clearly nonsense. I am good looking, have a fun personality, am not shy, hang out with the popular crowd, earn an above average salary and most importantly I have recently switched from a level 80 paladin to a lvl80 mage…..

    The graph either needs an “other” category, or do you think that since I once played a lvl80 paladin I am tainted for life?

  • 5 Ben // Sep 3, 2009 at 10:43 pm

    Agnitio, if you switched from a level 80 paladin to a level 80 mage, there is still hope for having a girlfriend. Believe I read a study that it’s not until you commandeer a level 80 death knight that the odds of companionship become insurmountable.

  • 6 Agnitio // Sep 3, 2009 at 11:40 pm

    That sounds about right Ben. Given that DKs work upon the premise of being able to “faceroll” (literally rolling your face across the keyboard) their way to success, I can see how they might have problems with the ladies…

    Although now that I think about it, maybe “game” as practiced by Roissy and bemoaned by Tyler Cowen
    is the real world equivilent of facerolling? So maybe your DK theorum is wrong?

  • 7 jimbo slice // Sep 8, 2009 at 1:54 pm

    I really thank people st8 trippin and dey need to keep it gangsta. i got em ladies and i do all these thangs

  • 8 Wedding // Oct 12, 2011 at 5:58 pm

    I really appreciate this excellent article you’ve got provided for us. I promise this may be great for most of the people.

  • 9 SELMA BAYOUTH // Nov 2, 2011 at 12:06 pm

    Good post. I be taught something more difficult on completely different blogs everyday. It should all the time be stimulating to learn content material from different writers and practice somewhat one thing from their store. I’d prefer to make use of some with the content on my blog whether you don’t mind. Natually I’ll provide you with a link in your net blog. Thanks for sharing.

  • 10 Salim113 // Dec 2, 2011 at 11:50 pm

    I intended to put you a little observation so as to say thank you again regarding the amazing views you’ve featured here. It has been so pretty generous with people like you to provide unhampered all a lot of people might have distributed as an electronic book to make some profit for their own end, primarily now that you could possibly have done it in case you considered necessary. These basics additionally acted to be the easy way to be certain that someone else have the identical fervor the same as my very own to grasp a whole lot more pertaining to this problem. I know there are a lot more pleasurable times ahead for individuals who examine your blog post.

  • 11 http://Www.Mediafire.com/ // May 23, 2013 at 10:17 pm

    This is really interesting, You are a very skilled blogger.
    I’ve joined your rss feed and look forward to seeking more of your magnificent post. Also, I’ve shared your
    web site in my social networks!

  • 12 gold tone watch // Dec 1, 2013 at 9:32 am

    It’s really a great and helpful piece of info. I’m satisfied that you simply shared this helpful info with us.
    Please keep us up to date like this. Thanks for sharing.

  • 13 ivl products promocodes // Apr 19, 2014 at 4:26 am

    If some one wants to be updated with newest technologies then he must be visit this web page and be up to date every day.

  • 14 lumens offer codes // Apr 20, 2014 at 2:47 am

    This is a topic that is near to my heart…

    Best wishes! Where are your contact details though?

  • 15 pure formulas free shipping codes // Apr 20, 2014 at 7:00 pm

    Hi this is kinda of off topic but I was wondering if blogs use WYSIWYG editors or if you have to manually code with HTML.

    I’m starting a blog soon but have no coding expertise so I wanted to
    get guidance from someone with experience.
    Any help would be greatly appreciated!

  • 16 spartan race cuopon codes // May 3, 2014 at 3:10 am

    Thank you for the good writeup. It in reality used to be a leisure account it.
    Glance complex to far added agreeable from you! However,
    how could we keep in touch?

Leave a Comment