Economists Do It With Models

Warning: “graphic” content…

Bookmark and Share
Incentives Aren’t Always About Compensation…

July 19th, 2008 · 5 Comments
Incentives · Sports

So, I am sitting at home on a beautiful Saturday afternoon watching a baseball game between the Boston Red Sox and the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim. (I know, I have issues.) Unlike most games, this one is on FOX, and, while I love Jerry Remy and Don Orsillo, it’s a nice change to hear what other announcers have to say. One of the more interesting points that they brought up was how well-trained the Angels players are in terms of the overall spectrum of baseball skills (sacrifices, bunting, strategic running, etc.). They credited the Angels’ minor league organization for this fact, saying that the minor league managers were somewhat unique in that they were more focused on developing players’ skills than on specifically winning games. Put that way, the managers’ goal makes perfect sense- I don’t really think there is a large benefit for a team due to a winning minor league organization. Furthermore, the incentives for the players are such that they are much more willing to practice and experiment in the minor leagues than they would be when a whole bunch of people (fans, other teams, etc.) are watching and critiquing. So why doesn’t this happen more often?

I am not overly familiar with the contracting structures for minor league managers, but I highly doubt that their compensation is directly dependent on the number of games that they win. (Players aren’t allowed to contract on such things, so it would stand to reason that managers can’t- or won’t- either, especially since no one seems to care about the minor league records.) Therefore, an economist might argue that there are no perverse incentives at play since there is no direct compensation for wins, which would incentivize wins at the expense of drilling fundamentals. However, the FOX announcers are quick to point out that there are indirect incentives for wins because minor league managers use their records as a selling point when angling for a promotion.

How can this unintended incentive be corrected for? One solution would be for an organization to commit to not using win-loss records in promotion decisions. This would work well for internal promotions, and seems to be roughly what goes on with player promotion to the big leagues. (There isn’t a particularly high correlation between minor league stats and getting called up.) But this would be ineffective overall, since an organization cannot prevent other teams from considering the records in external hiring decisions. A practical solution, then, would be to offer a competing incentive. Ideally, you would want to incentivize based on how well the manager drills the basic skills. Unfortunately, this is hard to measure, especially without distorting incentives in other ways, and there is a clear bias towards providing incentives for things that the easily measured. That said, the organization that can overcome that issue will end up with a very well-trained major league team, not to mention (theoretically) higher value for its minor league prospects.

Tags: Incentives · Sports

5 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Wedding // Oct 12, 2011 at 9:21 pm

    Thanks a lot for placing this up, it has been very useful and informed quite a bit

  • 2 Jahorina // Nov 27, 2011 at 5:42 pm

    Thanks a ton for any good writeup. Them the fact is appeared to be your theme akun them. Glance leading-edge so that you can more increased pleasurable out of you actually! However, the best way could most people relate?

  • 3 Roselin1582 // Dec 2, 2011 at 11:51 pm

    I needed to send you one tiny remark so as to say thanks once again for your personal precious secrets you have provided here. It is really surprisingly open-handed with people like you to make publicly what a number of people might have made available as an electronic book to generate some dough for themselves, mostly now that you might have tried it if you ever desired. The thoughts as well worked like a easy way to know that many people have the same keenness just as my very own to grasp somewhat more in terms of this condition. I think there are several more pleasurable moments ahead for those who scan through your blog.

  • 4 Property abroad // Dec 15, 2011 at 2:58 pm

    What i do not understood is in reality how you are not really a lot more neatly-appreciated than you might be right now. You are so intelligent. You realize therefore significantly on the subject of this topic, made me in my view believe it from numerous various angles. Its like women and men are not involved unless it’s something to do with Woman gaga! Your individual stuffs nice. All the time deal with it up!

  • 5 Donetta Haile // Apr 4, 2012 at 7:18 pm

    Hey not to go off topic but can anyone give me overview of. New York Car Insurance Reform 295 Greenwich St, New York, NY 10007 (646) 351-0824 They can be down the block with me. I was wondering if they were a good insurance company. I need to get hold of coverage, it is regulations you know, but I need to have a good price price plus I want friendly service.

Leave a Comment