Economists Do It With Models

Warning: “graphic” content…

Bookmark and Share
An Economist’s Dream Nowadays…

June 22nd, 2007 · 7 Comments

…is often to find clever instrumental variables in order to take advantage of what the social sciences like to call “natural experiments”. The basic rationale is that an economist (or other social scientist) doesn’t always have the luxury of running a controlled experiment in the real world as, say, a physicist would in the laboratory. However, in order to reach a valid conclusion, the economist must be able to identify a control and a treatment group, or have some form of exogenous (meaning coming from outside the system in question) variation in order to be able to identify cause and effect rather than just correlation.

The best general interest description of this topic (in my opinion) has come on February 27 in the Wall Street Journal in an article titled “Is an Economist Qualified To Solve Puzzle of Autism?”. (Apologies that the link will only be functional for 7 days.) The article mentions several examples of natural experiments, and I will go through the autism one here. Researchers have found that children that watch more television have higher rates of autism. Many people would jump to the conclusion that television watching in fact causes autism, which is not only incorrect logically but also runs counter to biological knowledge. The general problem in evaluating this cause and effect is that television watching is generally a choice variable, and it could be the case that either autistic children just like watching TV more or there is an outside force that results in both autism and desire for TV watching. A scientist could tease out cause and effect here by doing a large-scale study where children in the control group got no television and children in the experimental group had to watch TV all day. In addition to being potentially prohibitively expensive, this plan also suffers from various ethical issues. This is where economists come in. The economist basically says “gee, it would be really nice if there was an outside factor that randomly placed children into low TV and high TV groups so that I could measure the difference in outcomes that result.” This is exactly what an instrumental variable is. In the autism case, the instrument used is rainfall. The amount of rainfall within a region is fairly difficult to predict ahead of time, so families are not likely to be making decisions of where to live based on this information. That said, children in areas that turn out to be rainer are likely to be inside more, and thus likely to be watching more television. If the economist can show this link, and he can also show that kids in rainer areas have higher rates of autism, then there is fairly convincing evidence that there is a causal link between TV watching and autism. (Full disclosure: biologists are very up in arms over this conclusion, since autism is considered to be a hereditary rather than an environmental condition. The burden is also on the economist to rule out other potential explanations- for example, as pointed out in the article, one could also reach the probably erroneous conclusion that carrying an umbrella causes autism.)

So why am I bringing this up now? An article in today’s NYT talks about variation in medical treatment by ZIP code. Since people likely don’t choose the specific ZIP code to live in based on the potential medical care available (especially since an earlier article argued that high cost did not correlate with high quality), it seems like there is potential for ZIP code to be used as an instrument for…something. (It is also important to note here that the authors are careful to point out that cost is not correlated with rates of illness or cost of living.) For what? I’m not sure yet, but it’s interesting to think about. Suggestions welcome.

I will follow up with another post relating to the economics of specific points in the article.

Tags: Uncategorized

7 responses so far ↓

  • 1 free ad posting // Nov 26, 2011 at 3:13 pm

    Awesome information over again . Thanks .

  • 2 TV Headphones // Nov 30, 2011 at 12:40 pm

    I’m really impressed together with your authoring skills as well as considering the format to your weblog. Is that this an important payed off theme and made one modify the application your self? Anyway keep in the excellent high quality authoring, it is uncommon to see an important great weblog that fit this description you nowadays.

  • 3 chobe safari lodge // Jul 5, 2014 at 9:52 am

    We stumbled over here different website and thought I
    may as well check things out. I like what I see so now
    i am following you. Look forward to looking into your web
    page repeatedly.

  • 4 zoo world 2 cheat facebook game // Jul 8, 2014 at 8:57 am

    Hey there, You’ve done a great job. I will certainly digg it and personally recommend to my friends.
    I’m confident they will be benefited from
    this web site.

  • 5 family guy the quest for stuff hack // Jul 12, 2014 at 12:09 am

    Hey! Quick question that’s entirely off topic. Do you know how to make your site mobile friendly?

    My weblog looks weird when viewing from my apple iphone.
    I’m trying to find a theme or plugin that might be able to resolve
    this problem. If you have any suggestions, please share. With thanks!

  • 6 bouncy castles // Jul 13, 2014 at 11:10 am

    I’m amazed, I must say. Seldom do I come across a blog that’s equally educative and amusing, and let me tell you, you have hit the nail on the
    head. The problem is something which too few folks are speaking intelligently about.
    I’m very happy that I came across this during my hunt for something relating to this.

  • 7 buy online at cross18k // Jul 13, 2014 at 7:05 pm

    constantly i used to гead smaller articles oг reviews which
    as well cleaг their motive, and that is also happening with this piece of աriting
    which I am reading here.

Leave a Comment